On Sat, 17 Sep 2022 00:20:31 +0000 Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 05:24:49PM +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote: > > The DSA out-of-band tagging is still using the skb->headroom part, > > but there doesn't seem to be any better way for now without adding > > fields to struct sk_buff. > > Are we on the same page about what is meant by "skb extensions"? See > what is provided by CONFIG_SKB_EXTENSIONS, I did not mean it as in > "extend struct sk_buff with new fields". Yep, that was one of the other approaches I had in mind, and I've submitted a series adding fields to sk_buff in the past which was rejected (for good reasons). But indeed that comment on the cover-letter was misleading... Thanks, Maxime
