On 15/09/2022 23:18, Lad, Prabhakar wrote: > Hi Conor, > > Thank you for the review. > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 9:59 PM <Conor.Dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 15/09/2022 19:15, Prabhakar wrote: >>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe >>> >>> From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Introduce SOC_RENESAS_RZFIVE config option to enable Renesas RZ/Five >>> (R9A07G043) SoC, along side also add ARCH_RENESAS config option as most >>> of the Renesas drivers depend on this config option. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> v2->v3 >>> * Included RB tag from Geert >>> >>> v1->v2 >>> * No Change >>> --- >>> arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs | 14 ++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs b/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs >>> index 69774bb362d6..91b7f38b77a8 100644 >>> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs >>> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs >>> @@ -80,4 +80,18 @@ config SOC_CANAAN_K210_DTB_SOURCE >>> >>> endif # SOC_CANAAN >>> >>> +config ARCH_RENESAS >>> + bool >>> + select GPIOLIB >>> + select PINCTRL >>> + select SOC_BUS >> >> Do you really need to select SOC_BUS? >> Noone else does on RISC-V, hence my curiosity. >> > Yes we do need SOC_BUS due to soc_device_register() call in [0]. > Digging further I realized we can drop the above SOC_BUS as > SOC_RENESAS is selecting SOC_BUS [1] > > [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/soc/renesas/renesas-soc.c?h=v6.0-rc5#n487 > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/soc/renesas/Kconfig?h=v6.0-rc5#n5 > >>> + >>> +config SOC_RENESAS_RZFIVE >>> + bool "Renesas RZ/Five SoC" >>> + select ARCH_R9A07G043 >>> + select ARCH_RENESAS >>> + select RESET_CONTROLLER >>> + help >>> + This enables support for Renesas RZ/Five SoC. >> >> :thinking: isn't this pretty much what we decided not to do? >> And instead you would redefine ARCH_RENESAS in this file and >> not use SOC_RENESAS* at all? Will save me having to purge the >> the SOC symbol when I do the conversion. >> > I was under the impression we didn't come to a conclusion so kept the Might've been a good idea if I did a summary as I finished.. I guess I'll post one to the list tomorrow if I remember. > patch as is. I'll just make ARCH_RENESAS visible as Geert suggested > something like below: > > config ARCH_RENESAS > bool "Renesas RISC-V SoCs" > select GPIOLIB > select PINCTRL > select RESET_CONTROLLER > > > Cheers, > Prabhakar
