On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 04:16:01PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 11:12:02AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > Hello Rob, > > > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 02:14:55PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > > On Thu, 01 Sep 2022 15:55:23 +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > > > > Add "rockchip,rk3588-pwm" compatible string for PWM nodes found > > > > on a rk3588 platform. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > No driver changes required. > > > > --- > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.yaml | 1 + > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > > > > > Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the > > > following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is > > > incorrect. These may not be new warnings. > > > > > > Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check. > > > This will change in the future. > > > > Is this a list of *new* warnings, or is the report (somewhat) orthogonal > > to the actual change and you just used the opportunity that someone > > touched the pwm-rockchip binding to point out that there is some cleanup > > to do? > > > > > Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/ > > > > Hm, that gives me a 404. > > This is an existing problem with the rv1108 binding. > The rk3588 does not have pwm interrupts. I thought so, so: Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
