On Wed, 7 Sep 2022 15:49:24 -0500, Andrew Halaney wrote: > For RPMH regulators it doesn't make sense to indicate > regulator-allow-set-load without saying what modes you can switch to, > so be sure to indicate a dependency on regulator-allowed-modes. > > In general this is true for any regulators that are setting modes > instead of setting a load directly, for example RPMH regulators. A > counter example would be RPM based regulators, which set a load > change directly instead of a mode change. In the RPM case > regulator-allow-set-load alone is sufficient to describe the regulator > (the regulator can change its output current, here's the new load), > but in the RPMH case what valid operating modes exist must also be > stated to properly describe the regulator (the new load is this, what > is the optimum mode for this regulator with that load, let's change to > that mode now). > > [...] Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next Thanks! [1/1] regulator: dt-bindings: qcom,rpmh: Indicate regulator-allow-set-load dependencies commit: 08865c2150392f67769a9d6e0b02800be226a990 All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark
