On 07/09/2022 02:00, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > Adding in msm8939 which is based msm8916 dtsi I stumbled across a binding > check complaining about the phy name for msm8916 which we were reusing for > msm8939. > > The currently inconsistent upstream dtsi naming of "dsi" and "dsi-phy" is > not captured in the yaml for this driver. > > The driver however doesn't care about the name of DSI phy, hence the yaml > check is redundant. > > Both Krzysztof and Rob suggested we could drop the phy-names entirely if it > really isn't a dependency. > > So, drop the inconsistent and unnecessary phy-names field from the yaml. > > Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> Best regards, Krzysztof
