Re: [RFC PATCH v3 4/7] bus/cdx: add cdx-MSI domain with gic-its domain as parent

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2022-09-08 10:51, Radovanovic, Aleksandar wrote:
[AMD Official Use Only - General]



-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 08 September 2022 09:08
To: Radovanovic, Aleksandar <aleksandar.radovanovic@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>; Gupta, Nipun
<Nipun.Gupta@xxxxxxx>; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
rafael@xxxxxxxxxx; eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx; alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx;
cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx; Gupta, Puneet (DCG-ENG)
<puneet.gupta@xxxxxxx>; song.bao.hua@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx; f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx;
jeffrey.l.hugo@xxxxxxxxx; saravanak@xxxxxxxxxx;
Michael.Srba@xxxxxxxxx; mani@xxxxxxxxxx; yishaih@xxxxxxxxxx;
robin.murphy@xxxxxxx; will@xxxxxxxxxx; joro@xxxxxxxxxx;
masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx; ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kbuild@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
okaya@xxxxxxxxxx; Anand, Harpreet <harpreet.anand@xxxxxxx>; Agarwal,
Nikhil <nikhil.agarwal@xxxxxxx>; Simek, Michal <michal.simek@xxxxxxx>;
git (AMD-Xilinx) <git@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 4/7] bus/cdx: add cdx-MSI domain with gic-its
domain as parent

[CAUTION: External Email]
OK, so you definitely need a mapping, but it cannot be a translation, and it
needs to be in all the possible address spaces. OMG.

Could you elaborate why it needs to be in all the possible address spaces? I'm in no way familiar with kernel IOVA allocation, so not sure I understand this requirement. Note that each CDX device will have its own unique StreamID (in general case, equal to DeviceID sent to the GIC), so, from a SMMU perspective, the mapping can be specific to that device. As long as that IOVA is not allocated to any DMA region for _that_ device, things should be OK? But, I appreciate it might not be that simple from a kernel perspective.

That's the point - any device could could have its own mapping, therefore that hole has to be punched in *every* mapping that any of those devices could use, so that MSI writes don't unexpectedly fault, or corrupt memory if that address is free to be used to map a DMA buffer. At least the HiSilicon PCI quirk is functionally similar (for slightly different underlying reasons) so there's already precedent and an example that you can follow to a reasonable degree.

Robin.



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux