Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] soc: sifive: ccache: Rename SiFive L2 cache to Composable cache.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 2:23 PM <Conor.Dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 06/09/2022 02:44, Zong Li wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> >
> > <Conor.Dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 於 2022年9月6日 週二 凌晨2:48寫道:
> >>
> >> Noticed a another thing, sorry..
> >>
> >> On 05/09/2022 09:31, Zong Li wrote:
> >>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> >>>
> >>> From: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> Since composable cache may be L3 cache if pL2 cache exists, we should use
> >>> its original name composable cache to prevent confusion.
> >>>
> >>> Apart from renaming, we also add the compatible "sifive,ccache0" into ID
> >>> table.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Zong Li <zong.li@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>>   drivers/soc/sifive/Kconfig                    |   6 +-
> >>>   drivers/soc/sifive/Makefile                   |   2 +-
> >>>   .../{sifive_l2_cache.c => sifive_ccache.c}    | 163 +++++++++---------
> >>>   .../{sifive_l2_cache.h => sifive_ccache.h}    |  16 +-
> >>>   4 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
> >>>   rename drivers/soc/sifive/{sifive_l2_cache.c => sifive_ccache.c} (35%)
> >>>   rename include/soc/sifive/{sifive_l2_cache.h => sifive_ccache.h} (12%)
> >>>
> >>
> >>> -static ssize_t l2_write(struct file *file, const char __user *data,
> >>> +static ssize_t ccache_write(struct file *file, const char __user *data,
> >>>                          size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> >>
> >> You need to fix the alignment here as per checkpatch:
> >> CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> >> #112: FILE: drivers/soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.c:53:
> >> +static ssize_t ccache_write(struct file *file, const char __user *data,
> >> +                       size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> >>
> >
> > I'm not sure why I don't see that by checkpatch, but it looks that it
> > is actually misalignment there, I would re-check all indents in
> > source. Thanks.
>
> You need to pass --strict to checkpatch to see it.

Many thanks for the tip, I can see the message after applying the option.

>
> >
> >>>   {
> >>>          unsigned int val;
> >>> @@ -57,75 +57,76 @@ static ssize_t l2_write(struct file *file, const char __user *data,
> >>>          if (kstrtouint_from_user(data, count, 0, &val))
> >>>                  return -EINVAL;
> >>>          if ((val < 0xFF) || (val >= 0x10000 && val < 0x100FF))
> >>> -               writel(val, l2_base + SIFIVE_L2_ECCINJECTERR);
> >>> +               writel(val, ccache_base + SIFIVE_CCACHE_ECCINJECTERR);
> >>>          else
> >>>                  return -EINVAL;
> >>>          return count;
> >>>   }
> >>>
>




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux