On 04/09/2022 16:55, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 14:37:03 +0300 > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 2:06 PM Jonathan Cameron >> <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Thu, 1 Sep 2022 16:23:09 +0300 >>> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On 01/09/2022 15:16, Ciprian Regus wrote: >> >> ... >> >>>>> Datasheet: https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/2499fe.pdf >>>> >>>> Missing blank line. Use standard Git tools for handling your patches or >>>> be sure you produce the same result when using some custom process. >>> >>> My understanding is Datasheet is a standard tag as part of the main tag block. >>> There should not be a blank line between that and the Sign off. >>> >>> +CC Andy who can probably point to a reference for that... >> >> Yes, the idea to have a Datasheet as a formal tag. Which is, by the >> way, somehow established practice (since ca.2020). > > We should probably add it to the docs so we have somewhere to point at > beyond fairly common practice. > > Hohum. Anyone want to take that on with associated possible bikeshedding? Sorry for the noise then - I grepped, nothing popped up. It's not appearing in the checkpatch patterns, although indeed appears in the history, so it is fine. Thanks for clarification. Best regards, Krzysztof
