Hi Shawn, On 9/4/2022 6:44 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 01:52:13PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> Add i.MX93 mediamix blk ctrl support. i.MX93 mediamix blk ctrl has registers to set QoS(priority) value. It support default QoS value and cfg QoS value. Set an initial value from i.MX design team. If LCDIF/ISI/PXP wanna a different QoS value in future, they could use interconnect to request bandwidth. Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>This doesn't make too much sense for a new driver. It's mostly meaningful for fixes.
Drop it in V9.
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> --- drivers/soc/imx/Makefile | 2 +- drivers/soc/imx/imx93-blk-ctrl.c | 452 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 453 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 drivers/soc/imx/imx93-blk-ctrl.c diff --git a/drivers/soc/imx/Makefile b/drivers/soc/imx/Makefile index a0baa2a01adb..754866e0a10d 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/imx/Makefile +++ b/drivers/soc/imx/Makefile @@ -7,4 +7,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_IMX_GPCV2_PM_DOMAINS) += gpcv2.o obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX8M) += soc-imx8m.o obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX8M) += imx8m-blk-ctrl.o obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX8M) += imx8mp-blk-ctrl.o -obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX9) += imx93-src.o imx93-pd.o +obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX9) += imx93-src.o imx93-pd.o imx93-blk-ctrl.oMaybe have it on a separate line?
Sure.
+obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX9) += imx93-blk-ctrl.odiff --git a/drivers/soc/imx/imx93-blk-ctrl.c b/drivers/soc/imx/imx93-blk-ctrl.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..12f4e635b46d --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/soc/imx/imx93-blk-ctrl.c @@ -0,0 +1,452 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Copyright 2022 NXP, Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> + */ + +#include <linux/clk.h> +#include <linux/device.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/of_device.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/pm_domain.h> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h> +#include <linux/regmap.h> +#include <linux/sizes.h> + +#include <dt-bindings/power/fsl,imx93-power.h> + +#define BLK_SFT_RSTN 0x0 +#define BLK_CLK_EN 0x4 +#define BLK_MAX_CLKS 4 + +#define DOMAIN_MAX_CLKS 4 + +#define LCDIF_QOS_REG 0xC +#define LCDIF_DEFAULT_QOS_OFF 12 +#define LCDIF_CFG_QOS_OFF 8 + +#define PXP_QOS_REG 0x10 +#define PXP_R_DEFAULT_QOS_OFF 28 +#define PXP_R_CFG_QOS_OFF 24 +#define PXP_W_DEFAULT_QOS_OFF 20 +#define PXP_W_CFG_QOS_OFF 16 + +#define ISI_CACHE_REG 0x14 + +#define ISI_QOS_REG 0x1C +#define ISI_V_DEFAULT_QOS_OFF 28 +#define ISI_V_CFG_QOS_OFF 24 +#define ISI_U_DEFAULT_QOS_OFF 20 +#define ISI_U_CFG_QOS_OFF 16 +#define ISI_Y_R_DEFAULT_QOS_OFF 12 +#define ISI_Y_R_CFG_QOS_OFF 8 +#define ISI_Y_W_DEFAULT_QOS_OFF 4 +#define ISI_Y_W_CFG_QOS_OFF 0 + +#define PRIO_MASK 0xF + +#define PRIO(X) (X) + +struct imx93_blk_ctrl_domain; + +struct imx93_blk_ctrl { + struct device *dev; + struct regmap *regmap; + int num_clks; + struct clk_bulk_data clks[BLK_MAX_CLKS]; + struct imx93_blk_ctrl_domain *domains; + struct genpd_onecell_data onecell_data; +}; + +#define DOMAIN_MAX_QOS 4 + +struct imx93_blk_ctrl_qos { + u32 reg; + u32 cfg_off; + u32 default_prio; + u32 cfg_prio; +}; + +struct imx93_blk_ctrl_domain_data { + const char *name; + const char * const *clk_names; + int num_clks; + u32 rst_mask; + u32 clk_mask; + u32 num_qos; + struct imx93_blk_ctrl_qos qos[DOMAIN_MAX_QOS]; + const struct regmap_access_table *reg_access_table;It seems to me that reg_access_table is something specific to imx93_blk_ctrl rather than imx93_blk_ctrl_domain.
Right, I only set reg_access_table for bus, not for child domain. But In this driver, bus and child domain share the same data structure "struct imx93_blk_ctrl_domain_data"
+}; + +struct imx93_blk_ctrl_domain { + struct generic_pm_domain genpd; + const struct imx93_blk_ctrl_domain_data *data; + struct clk_bulk_data clks[DOMAIN_MAX_CLKS]; + struct imx93_blk_ctrl *bc; +}; + +struct imx93_blk_ctrl_data { + const struct imx93_blk_ctrl_domain_data *domains; + const struct imx93_blk_ctrl_domain_data *bus;It looks confusing to claim 'bus' as an imx93_blk_ctrl_domain_data. I would suggest you have 'related' fields directly defined in imx93_blk_ctrl_data.
This would implies a bit large change to this driver. Should I use a new V1 for the patchset or continue V9 for next version?
+ int num_domains; +}; + +static inline struct imx93_blk_ctrl_domain * +to_imx93_blk_ctrl_domain(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) +{ + return container_of(genpd, struct imx93_blk_ctrl_domain, genpd); +} + +static int imx93_blk_ctrl_set_qos(struct imx93_blk_ctrl_domain *domain) +{ + const struct imx93_blk_ctrl_domain_data *data = domain->data; + struct imx93_blk_ctrl *bc = domain->bc; + const struct imx93_blk_ctrl_qos *qos; + u32 val, mask; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < data->num_qos; i++) { + qos = &data->qos[i]; + + mask = PRIO_MASK << qos->cfg_off; + mask |= PRIO_MASK << (qos->cfg_off + 4); + val = qos->cfg_prio << qos->cfg_off; + val |= qos->default_prio << (qos->cfg_off + 4); + + regmap_write_bits(bc->regmap, qos->reg, mask, val); + + dev_dbg(bc->dev, "data->qos[i].reg 0x%x 0x%x\n", qos->reg, val); + } + + return 0; +} + +static int imx93_blk_ctrl_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) +{ + struct imx93_blk_ctrl_domain *domain = to_imx93_blk_ctrl_domain(genpd); + const struct imx93_blk_ctrl_domain_data *data = domain->data; + struct imx93_blk_ctrl *bc = domain->bc; + int ret; + + ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(bc->num_clks, bc->clks); + if (ret) { + dev_err(bc->dev, "failed to enable bus clocks\n"); + return ret; + } + + ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(data->num_clks, domain->clks); + if (ret) { + clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(bc->num_clks, bc->clks); + dev_err(bc->dev, "failed to enable clocks\n"); + return ret; + } + + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(bc->dev); + if (ret < 0) { + pm_runtime_put_noidle(bc->dev); + dev_err(bc->dev, "failed to power up domain\n"); + goto disable_clk; + } + + /* ungate clk */ + regmap_clear_bits(bc->regmap, BLK_CLK_EN, data->clk_mask); + + /* release reset */ + regmap_set_bits(bc->regmap, BLK_SFT_RSTN, data->rst_mask); + + dev_dbg(bc->dev, "pd_on: name: %s\n", genpd->name); + + return imx93_blk_ctrl_set_qos(domain); + +disable_clk: + clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(data->num_clks, domain->clks); + + return ret; +} + +static int imx93_blk_ctrl_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) +{ + struct imx93_blk_ctrl_domain *domain = to_imx93_blk_ctrl_domain(genpd); + const struct imx93_blk_ctrl_domain_data *data = domain->data; + struct imx93_blk_ctrl *bc = domain->bc; + + dev_info(bc->dev, "pd_off: name: %s\n", genpd->name); + + regmap_clear_bits(bc->regmap, BLK_SFT_RSTN, data->rst_mask); + regmap_set_bits(bc->regmap, BLK_CLK_EN, data->clk_mask); + + pm_runtime_put(bc->dev); + + clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(data->num_clks, domain->clks); + + clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(bc->num_clks, bc->clks); + + return 0; +} + +static struct generic_pm_domain * +imx93_blk_ctrl_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *args, void *data) +{ + struct genpd_onecell_data *onecell_data = data; + unsigned int index = args->args[0]; + + if (args->args_count != 1 || + index >= onecell_data->num_domains) + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + + return onecell_data->domains[index]; +}Why don't we just use the genpd_xlate_onecell() defined by genpd core?
Thanks for tips, genpd_xlate_onecell is better, I follow imx8m-blk-ctrl driver, that driver could also use genpd_xlate_onecell.
+ +static int imx93_blk_ctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + const struct imx93_blk_ctrl_data *bc_data = of_device_get_match_data(dev); + const struct imx93_blk_ctrl_domain_data *bus = bc_data->bus; + struct imx93_blk_ctrl *bc; + void __iomem *base; + int i, ret; + + struct regmap_config regmap_config = { + .reg_bits = 32, + .val_bits = 32, + .reg_stride = 4, + .rd_table = bus->reg_access_table, + .wr_table = bus->reg_access_table, + .max_register = SZ_4K, + }; + + bc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*bc), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!bc) + return -ENOMEM; + + bc->dev = dev; + + base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0); + if (IS_ERR(base)) + return PTR_ERR(base); + + bc->regmap = devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, base, ®map_config); + if (IS_ERR(bc->regmap)) + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(bc->regmap), + "failed to init regmap\n"); + + bc->domains = devm_kcalloc(dev, bc_data->num_domains + 1,Why do we need one more domain than what bc_data defines?
I could not recall, but seems the extra one could be dropped.
+ sizeof(struct imx93_blk_ctrl_domain), + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!bc->domains) + return -ENOMEM; + + bc->onecell_data.num_domains = bc_data->num_domains; + bc->onecell_data.xlate = imx93_blk_ctrl_xlate; + bc->onecell_data.domains = + devm_kcalloc(dev, bc_data->num_domains, + sizeof(struct generic_pm_domain *), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!bc->onecell_data.domains) + return -ENOMEM; + + for (i = 0; i < bus->num_clks; i++) + bc->clks[i].id = bus->clk_names[i]; + bc->num_clks = bus->num_clks; + + ret = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, bc->num_clks, bc->clks); + if (ret) { + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to get bus clock\n"); + return ret; + } + + for (i = 0; i < bc_data->num_domains; i++) { + const struct imx93_blk_ctrl_domain_data *data = &bc_data->domains[i]; + struct imx93_blk_ctrl_domain *domain = &bc->domains[i]; + int j; + + domain->data = data; + + for (j = 0; j < data->num_clks; j++) + domain->clks[j].id = data->clk_names[j]; + + ret = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, data->num_clks, domain->clks); + if (ret) { + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to get clock\n"); + goto cleanup_pds; + } + + domain->genpd.name = data->name; + domain->genpd.power_on = imx93_blk_ctrl_power_on; + domain->genpd.power_off = imx93_blk_ctrl_power_off; + domain->bc = bc; + + ret = pm_genpd_init(&domain->genpd, NULL, true); + if (ret) { + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to init power domain\n"); + goto cleanup_pds; + } + + bc->onecell_data.domains[i] = &domain->genpd; + } + + pm_runtime_enable(dev); + + ret = of_genpd_add_provider_onecell(dev->of_node, &bc->onecell_data); + if (ret) { + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to add power domain provider\n"); + goto cleanup_pds; + } + + dev_set_drvdata(dev, bc); + + return 0; + +cleanup_pds: + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) + pm_genpd_remove(&bc->domains[i].genpd); + + return ret; +} + +static int imx93_blk_ctrl_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct imx93_blk_ctrl *bc = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev); + int i; + + of_genpd_del_provider(pdev->dev.of_node); + + for (i = 0; bc->onecell_data.num_domains; i++) { + struct imx93_blk_ctrl_domain *domain = &bc->domains[i]; + + pm_genpd_remove(&domain->genpd); + } + + return 0; +} + +static const struct imx93_blk_ctrl_domain_data imx93_media_blk_ctl_domain_data[] = { + [IMX93_MEDIABLK_PD_MIPI_DSI] = { + .name = "mediablk-mipi-dsi", + .clk_names = (const char *[]){ "dsi" }, + .num_clks = 1, + .rst_mask = BIT(11) | BIT(12), + .clk_mask = BIT(11) | BIT(12), + }, + [IMX93_MEDIABLK_PD_MIPI_CSI] = { + .name = "mediablk-mipi-csi", + .clk_names = (const char *[]){ "cam", "csi" }, + .num_clks = 2, + .rst_mask = BIT(9) | BIT(10), + .clk_mask = BIT(9) | BIT(10), + }, + [IMX93_MEDIABLK_PD_PXP] = { + .name = "mediablk-pxp", + .clk_names = (const char *[]){ "pxp" }, + .num_clks = 1, + .rst_mask = BIT(7) | BIT(8), + .clk_mask = BIT(7) | BIT(8), + .num_qos = 2, + .qos = { + { + .reg = PXP_QOS_REG, + .cfg_off = PXP_R_CFG_QOS_OFF, + .default_prio = PRIO(3), + .cfg_prio = PRIO(6), + }, { + .reg = PXP_QOS_REG, + .cfg_off = PXP_W_CFG_QOS_OFF, + .default_prio = PRIO(3), + .cfg_prio = PRIO(6), + } + } + }, + [IMX93_MEDIABLK_PD_LCDIF] = { + .name = "mediablk-lcdif", + .clk_names = (const char *[]){ "disp", "lcdif" }, + .num_clks = 2, + .rst_mask = BIT(4) | BIT(5) | BIT(6), + .clk_mask = BIT(4) | BIT(5) | BIT(6), + .num_qos = 1, + .qos = { + { + .reg = LCDIF_QOS_REG, + .cfg_off = LCDIF_CFG_QOS_OFF, + .default_prio = PRIO(3), + .cfg_prio = PRIO(7), + } + } + }, + [IMX93_MEDIABLK_PD_ISI] = { + .name = "mediablk-isi", + .clk_names = (const char *[]){ "isi" }, + .num_clks = 1, + .rst_mask = BIT(2) | BIT(3), + .clk_mask = BIT(2) | BIT(3), + .num_qos = 4, + .qos = { + { + .reg = ISI_QOS_REG, + .cfg_off = ISI_Y_W_CFG_QOS_OFF, + .default_prio = PRIO(3), + .cfg_prio = PRIO(7), + }, { + .reg = ISI_QOS_REG, + .cfg_off = ISI_Y_R_CFG_QOS_OFF, + .default_prio = PRIO(3), + .cfg_prio = PRIO(7), + }, { + .reg = ISI_QOS_REG, + .cfg_off = ISI_U_CFG_QOS_OFF, + .default_prio = PRIO(3), + .cfg_prio = PRIO(7), + }, { + .reg = ISI_QOS_REG, + .cfg_off = ISI_V_CFG_QOS_OFF, + .default_prio = PRIO(3), + .cfg_prio = PRIO(7), + } + } + }, +}; + +static const struct regmap_range imx93_media_blk_ctl_yes_ranges[] = { + regmap_reg_range(BLK_SFT_RSTN, BLK_CLK_EN), + regmap_reg_range(LCDIF_QOS_REG, ISI_CACHE_REG), + regmap_reg_range(ISI_QOS_REG, ISI_QOS_REG),One level indent is enough.
Got it.
+}; + +static const struct regmap_access_table imx93_media_blk_ctl_access_table = { + .yes_ranges = imx93_media_blk_ctl_yes_ranges, + .n_yes_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(imx93_media_blk_ctl_yes_ranges),Inconsistent indent around '=' with imx93_media_blk_ctl_bus_data and imx93_media_blk_ctl_dev_data below.
Got it.
+}; + +static const struct imx93_blk_ctrl_domain_data imx93_media_blk_ctl_bus_data = { + .clk_names = (const char *[]){ "axi", "apb", "nic", }, + .num_clks = 3, + .reg_access_table = &imx93_media_blk_ctl_access_table, +}; + +static const struct imx93_blk_ctrl_data imx93_media_blk_ctl_dev_data = { + .domains = imx93_media_blk_ctl_domain_data, + .bus = &imx93_media_blk_ctl_bus_data, + .num_domains = ARRAY_SIZE(imx93_media_blk_ctl_domain_data), +}; + +static const struct of_device_id imx93_blk_ctrl_of_match[] = { + { + .compatible = "fsl,imx93-media-blk-ctrl", + .data = &imx93_media_blk_ctl_dev_data + }, { + /* Sentinel */ + } +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx93_blk_ctrl_of_match); + +static struct platform_driver imx93_blk_ctrl_driver = { + .probe = imx93_blk_ctrl_probe, + .remove = imx93_blk_ctrl_remove, + .driver = { + .name = "imx93-blk-ctrl", + .of_match_table = imx93_blk_ctrl_of_match, + }, +}; +module_platform_driver(imx93_blk_ctrl_driver); + +MODULE_AUTHOR("Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>"); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("i.MX93 BLK CTRL driver"); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");"GPL v2"
No. Per ./Documentation/process/license-rules.rst, GPL should be used. Thanks, Peng.
Shawn