Hi Shawn,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/6] arm64: dts: imx8ulp: correct the scmi sram
> node name
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 10:25:48PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > Follow sram/sram.yaml to update the sram node name.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi
> > index 8460a3cba107..7a88d7016b49 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi
> > @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ sram@2201f000 {
> > #size-cells = <1>;
> > ranges = <0 0x0 0x2201f000 0x1000>;
> >
> > - scmi_buf: scmi-buf@0 {
> > + scmi_buf: scmi-sram-section@0 {
>
> While the commit log mentions sram/sram.yaml, the binding doc says:
>
> $nodename:
> pattern: "^sram(@.*)?"
>
> Does scmi-sram-section match the pattern?
Yes, it match. See line 66:
patternProperties:
"^([a-z0-9]*-)?sram(-section)?@[a-f0-9]+$":
I also checked
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
Thanks,
Peng.
>
> Shawn
>
> > compatible = "arm,scmi-shmem";
> > reg = <0x0 0x400>;
> > };
> > --
> > 2.37.1
> >
