On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 4:44 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 19:59:44 +0100, > Frank Li <frank.li@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > And I stand by my initial request. "a" doesn't convey any sort of > > > useful information. Why not "I" and "II", while we're at it? Or > > > something even funkier? > > > > MU spec use term "a" and "b", user have to map "I" an "II" to > > "a" and "b" when read MU spec and code. it is not straightforward. > > > > I quote a part of spec. > > " The MU is connected as a peripheral under the Peripheral bus on both sides-on > > the Processor A-side, the Processor A Peripheral Bus, and on the Processor B side, > > the Processor B Peripheral Bus." > > > > Rob Herring and Marc Zynginer: > > I can change to any name, which you agree both. > > > > Some options: > > 1. "a", "b" > > 2. "a-side", "b-side" > > 3. "a-facing", "b-facing" > > 4. "I", "II" > > Use the wording indicated in the spec: "processor-a-side", and > "processor-b-side". This is what I asked the first place. I would pick 2 (or nothing), but whatever... As long as there aren't spaces. Rob
