On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 04:07:56PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 03:50:42PM +0100, Frans Klaver wrote: > > From: René Moll <linux@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Signed-off-by: René Moll <linux@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Tjerk Hofmeijer <tjerk.hofmeijer@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Frans Klaver <frans.klaver@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../bindings/power/reset/ltc2952-poweroff.txt | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/reset/ltc2952-poweroff.txt > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/reset/ltc2952-poweroff.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/reset/ltc2952-poweroff.txt > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..c3f3d9e > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/reset/ltc2952-poweroff.txt > > @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ > > +Binding for the LTC2952 PowerPath controller > > + > > +This chip is used to externally trigger a system shut down. Once the trigger > > +has been sent, the chips watchdog has to be reset to gracefully shut down. > > s/chips/chip's/ > > > If +the Linux systems decides to shut down, it powers off the platform > > via the +poweroff signal. > > This sentence can go; the binding should describe the hardware rather > than the Linux behaviour. > Maybe find an operating system independent wording and describe what the implementation should do. Or is that out of scope as well ? Thanks, Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
