On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 3:48 PM Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello Bartosz, can you pick this? Patches 1 and 2 were applied to MFD > tree. > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 06:33:43PM +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > > STMPE driver does not require a specific node name anymore, only the > > compatible is checked, update binding according to this. > > > > Signed-off-by: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-stmpe.txt | 3 +-- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-stmpe.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-stmpe.txt > > index a0e4cf885213..b33f8f02c0d7 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-stmpe.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-stmpe.txt > > @@ -8,8 +8,7 @@ Optional properties: > > - st,norequest-mask: bitmask specifying which GPIOs should _not_ be requestable > > due to different usage (e.g. touch, keypad) > > > > -Node name must be stmpe_gpio and should be child node of stmpe node to which it > > -belongs. > > +Node should be child node of stmpe node to which it belongs. > > > > Example: > > stmpe_gpio { > > -- > > 2.25.1 > > > Sorry, I was off most of August and missed this one. Now applied. Bart