On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 09:38:39AM +0200, Christophe Ricard wrote: > I would just add an additional comment to my previous message. > After reviewing Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt, it looks like it > is *not* necessary to send this patch marked as stable because of the > following rule: > "- It must fix a real bug that bothers people (not a, "This could be a > problem..." type thing)." > As argued previously this patch is more an algorithm fix luckily never > seen with the current ST33 I2C TPM devices. > I looks like a "This could be a problem..." > Do you agree with this ? Yes, please clarify your patch description with something like: 'This never happens in practice because the burst count is XXX bytes and the largest TPM command is YYY bytes.' Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
