On Thu, 2022-08-25 at 22:57 +0800, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
> On 25/08/2022 11:14, Bo-Chen Chen wrote:
> > From: "Jason-JH.Lin" <jason-jh.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > For previous MediaTek SoCs, such as MT8173, there are 2 display HW
> > pipelines binding to 1 mmsys with the same power domain, the same
> > clock driver and the same mediatek-drm driver.
> >
> > For MT8195, VDOSYS0 and VDOSYS1 are 2 display HW pipelines binding
> > to
> > 2 different power domains, different clock drivers and different
> > mediatek-drm drivers.
> >
> > Moreover, Hardware pipeline of VDOSYS0 has these components: COLOR,
> > CCORR, AAL, GAMMA, DITHER. They are related to the PQ (Picture
> > Quality)
> > and they makes VDOSYS0 supports PQ function while they are not
> > including in VDOSYS1.
> >
> > Hardware pipeline of VDOSYS1 has the component ETHDR (HDR related
> > component). It makes VDOSYS1 supports the HDR function while it's
> > not
> > including in VDOSYS0.
> >
> > To summarize0:
> > Only VDOSYS0 can support PQ adjustment.
> > Only VDOSYS1 can support HDR adjustment.
> >
> > Therefore, we need to separate these two different mmsys hardwares
> > to
> > 2 different compatibles for MT8195.
> >
> > Fixes: 81c5a41d10b9 ("dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: mmsys: add mt8195
> > SoC binding")
> > Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Bo-Chen Chen <rex-bc.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Changes for v2:
> > 1. Add hardware difference for VDOSYS0 and VDOSYS1 in commit
> > message.
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml |
> > 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yam
> > l
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yam
> > l
> > index 6ad023eec193..bfbdd30d2092 100644
> > ---
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yam
> > l
> > +++
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yam
> > l
> > @@ -31,7 +31,8 @@ properties:
> > - mediatek,mt8183-mmsys
> > - mediatek,mt8186-mmsys
> > - mediatek,mt8192-mmsys
> > - - mediatek,mt8195-mmsys
> > + - mediatek,mt8195-vdosys0
>
> Thanks for you patch. As I mentioned on v1, I propose to set
> mediatek,mt8195-mmsys as fallback for mediatek,mt8195-vdosys0 to not
> break
> backwards compatibility.
>
> Apart from that, the binding change will need some changes to support
> the new
> binding. Please provide these together with this patch.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
Hello Matthias,
Thanks for your comments.
The purpose of this patch is to confirm we can separate mt8195 mmsys
into two compatibles. I think this modification is accepted.
After this, I think Jason-JH will push another series with this binding
patch. In Jason-JH's series, we will modify mmsys driver based on this.
And I think we don't need to keep "mediatek,mt8195-mmsys" if we also
modify mmsys drivers in the same series.
Is it ok that postpones to pick this patch until we finish review
follow-up series?
BRs,
Bo-Chen
> > + - mediatek,mt8195-vdosys > -
> > mediatek,mt8365-mmsys
> > - const: syscon
> > - items:
