On 25/08/2022 13:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > On 25/08/2022 15:30, Conor.Dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> On 25/08/2022 13:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe >>> >>> On 20/08/2022 23:41, Conor Dooley wrote: >>>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> The SD card and eMMC on PolarFire SoC based dev boards are sometimes >>>> statically muxed using a GPIO. To facilitate this, enable gpio-hog >>>> child node properties. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> .../bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml >>>> index 110651eafa70..6704a7a52cd0 100644 >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml >>>> @@ -44,6 +44,24 @@ properties: >>>> >>>> gpio-controller: true >>>> >>>> +patternProperties: >>>> + "^.+-hog(?:-[0-9]+)?$": >>> >>> What is this pattern about: "(?:" ? >> >> Me being a pedant I suppose. "()" is a capture while "(?:)" is a match. >> However, it does seem like json-schema suggests using "()": >> https://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/reference/regular_expressions.html >> >> I don't mind & neither does the schema checker. > > Use what existing sources are doing, so "^.+-hog(-[0-9]+)?$" Willdo :)
