On 23.08.2022 13:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 20/08/2022 11:07, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
Define DSA port binding per switch model as each switch model requires
different values for certain properties.
Define reg property on $defs as it's the same for all switch models.
Remove unnecessary lines as they are already included from the referred
dsa.yaml.
Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml | 56 +++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml
index 657e162a1c01..7c4374e16f96 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml
@@ -130,38 +130,47 @@ properties:
ethsys.
maxItems: 1
-patternProperties:
- "^(ethernet-)?ports$":
- type: object
-
- patternProperties:
- "^(ethernet-)?port@[0-9]+$":
- type: object
- description: Ethernet switch ports
Again, I don't understand why do you remove definitions of these nodes
from top-level properties. I explained what I expect in previous
discussion and I am confused to hear "this cannot be done".
I agree it can be done, but the binding is done with less lines the
current way.
I would need to add more lines than just for creating the node structure
since dsa.yaml is not referred.
Then, I would have to create the node structure again for the dsa-port
checks.
Arınç