On 23/08/2022 10:31, xinlei.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: xinlei lee <xinlei.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > In the original mtk_disp_pwm_get_state() function, the result of reading > con0 & BIT(0) is enabled as disp_pwm. > In order to conform to the register table, we should use the disp_pwm > base address as the enabled judgment. > > Fixes: 3f2b16734914 ("pwm: mtk-disp: Implement atomic API .get_state()") > Signed-off-by: xinlei lee <xinlei.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxx> This is a fix so not really related with the change adding new device. Send them separately in the future. Best regards, Krzysztof