Hi Conor,
On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 10:49 AM <Conor.Dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 20/08/2022 09:45, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 8:40 PM <Conor.Dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On 15/08/2022 16:14, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> >>> Add initial device tree for Renesas RZ/Five RISC-V CPU Core (AX45MP
> >>> Single).
> >>>
> >>> Below is the list of IP blocks added in the initial SoC DTSI which can be
> >>> used to boot via initramfs on RZ/Five SMARC EVK:
> >>> - AX45MP CPU
> >>> - CPG
> >>> - PINCTRL
> >>> - PLIC
> >>> - SCIF0
> >>> - SYSC
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> That aside, by convention so far we have put things like extals or
> >> reference clocks below the /cpus node. Could you do the same here too
> >> please?
> >
> > Really? We've been putting them at the root node for a long time,
> > since the separate "clocks" grouping subnode was deprecated.
> > The extal-clk is not even part of the SoC, so it should definitely
> > not be under the /cpus node.
>
> Under may have been a confusing choice of words, I meant "physically"
> under it in the file. Maybe after would have been a better choice of
> words? I wasn't suggesting you put it inside the CPUs node.
> Does that make more sense?
Oh right, you mean the order of the nodes. Yes, "extal-clk" should
be after "cpus", following alphabetical sort order, as the nodes have no
unit addresses.
Sorry for missing that in my review. I also misread "below"
(in Dutch there is only a single word for "below" and "under" ;-)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
