Hi
On 8/17/22 00:14, Ben Dooks wrote:
Moving towards adding non-pci support for the driver, move the pci
parts out of the core into their own module. This is partly due to
the module_driver() code only being allowed once in a module and also
to avoid a number of #ifdef if we build a single file in a system
without pci support.
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
I quickly tested this on Intel Elkhart and didn't notice any regression.
A few comments below.
drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 14 +++-
drivers/pwm/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc-pci.c | 133 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.c | 158 +-------------------------------------
drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.h | 58 ++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 207 insertions(+), 157 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc-pci.c
create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.h
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
index 3f3c53af4a56..a9f1c554db2b 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
@@ -175,15 +175,23 @@ config PWM_CROS_EC
Controller.
config PWM_DWC
- tristate "DesignWare PWM Controller"
- depends on PCI || COMPILE_TEST
+ tristate "DesignWare PWM Controller core"
depends on HAS_IOMEM
help
- PWM driver for Synopsys DWC PWM Controller attached to a PCI bus.
+ PWM driver for Synopsys DWC PWM Controller.
To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
will be called pwm-dwc.
+config PWM_DWC_PCI
+ tristate "DesignWare PWM Controller core"
Same text as core part has. How about "DesignWare PWM Controller PCI
driver"?
+ depends on PWM_DWC && HAS_IOMEM && PCI
+ help
+ PWM driver for Synopsys DWC PWM Controller attached to a PCI bus.
+
+ To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
+ will be called pwm-dwc-pci.
+
config PWM_EP93XX
tristate "Cirrus Logic EP93xx PWM support"
depends on ARCH_EP93XX || COMPILE_TEST
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Makefile b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
index 7bf1a29f02b8..a70d36623129 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_CLPS711X) += pwm-clps711x.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_CRC) += pwm-crc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_CROS_EC) += pwm-cros-ec.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_DWC) += pwm-dwc.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_DWC_PCI) += pwm-dwc-pci.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_EP93XX) += pwm-ep93xx.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_FSL_FTM) += pwm-fsl-ftm.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_HIBVT) += pwm-hibvt.o
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc-pci.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc-pci.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..2213d0e7f3c8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc-pci.c
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * DesignWare PWM Controller driver (PCI part)
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2018-2020 Intel Corporation
+ *
+ * Author: Felipe Balbi (Intel)
+ * Author: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+ * Author: Raymond Tan <raymond.tan@xxxxxxxxx>
+ *
+ * Limitations:
+ * - The hardware cannot generate a 0 % or 100 % duty cycle. Both high and low
+ * periods are one or more input clock periods long.
+ */
+
I think this is more common limitation rather than PCI part.
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.c
@@ -1,16 +1,12 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/*
- * DesignWare PWM Controller driver
+ * DesignWare PWM Controller driver core
*
* Copyright (C) 2018-2020 Intel Corporation
*
* Author: Felipe Balbi (Intel)
* Author: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
* Author: Raymond Tan <raymond.tan@xxxxxxxxx>
- *
- * Limitations:
- * - The hardware cannot generate a 0 % or 100 % duty cycle. Both high and low
- * periods are one or more input clock periods long.
*/
Relates to previous comment, is there reason why this limitation is
removed from the core part?
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.h
+#define DWC_CLK_PERIOD_NS 10
Perhaps this addition can be removed if patch 7/10 goes before this
patch? It's anyway specific to PCI part only.
