On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 15:14:04 -0400 Sean Anderson wrote: > > Ack, no question. I'm trying to tell you got to actually get stuff in. > > It's the first week after the merge window and people are dumping code > > the had written over the dead time on the list, while some reviewers > > and maintainers are still on their summer vacation. So being > > considerate is even more important than normally. > > OK, so perhaps a nice place to split the series is after patch 11. If > you would like to review/apply a set of <15 patches, that is the place > to break things. I can of course resend again with just those, if that's > what I need to do to get these applied. Mm, okay, let's give folks the customary 24h to object, otherwise I'll pull in the first 11 tomorrow. > That said, I specifically broke this series up into many small patches > to make it easier to review. Each patch does exactly one thing. Had I > known about these limits based on patch size, I would have just squashed > everything into 15 patches. I think an arbitrary limit such as this has > a perverse incentive. Practically speaking I think it works out fairly nicely, IDK. There's trade offs like always. Takes a bit of getting used to.
