On 17/08/2022 11:39, Samuel Holland wrote: >>> The same question applies for the D1 SoC DTSI, where I use this same construct. >> >> This is not correct and should be fixed. Either you add the schema with >> compatible or please drop the device node from the DTSI. > > That's what I was afraid of. The bindings can grow, so you can add a bindings stub documenting compatibles (device + simple-mfd + syscon) and IO space, then later extend it. Of course it is preferred to add bindings as complete as possible, but incremental growing also works. Best regards, Krzysztof
