On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 12:40 PM Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 6:41 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 12:17:08PM +0100, Lad Prabhakar wrote: > > > renesas.yaml lists out all the Renesas SoC's and the platforms/EVK's which > > > is either ARM32/ARM64. It would rather make sense if we move renesas.yaml > > > to the soc/renesas folder instead. This is in preparation for adding a new > > > SoC (RZ/Five) from Renesas which is based on RISC-V. > > > > Please post this as part of the above. > > > Sure, I just wanted to get some feedback on this so had it posted separately. > > > bindings/soc/ is just a dumping ground for stuff that doesn't fit > > anywhere. We've mostly cleaned bindings/arm/ of that, so I don't really > > want to start that again. I would propose bindings/board/ instead if we > > move in this direction. > > > OK. So to clarify, how do we separate it further bindings/board/<based > on SoC vendor> or bindings/board/<board manufacturer>? The latter doesn't work with how the schemas are structured. Rob
