在 2022-08-14星期日的 12:36 -0500，Samuel Holland写道：
> Now that the SRAM readout code is fixed by using 32-bit accesses, it
> always returns the same values as register readout, so the A64
> variant
> no longer needs the workaround. This makes the D1 variant structure
> redundant, so remove it.
Is this really tested on A64?
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> drivers/nvmem/sunxi_sid.c | 8 +-------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/sunxi_sid.c b/drivers/nvmem/sunxi_sid.c
> index 92dfe4cb10e3..a970f1741cc6 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/sunxi_sid.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/sunxi_sid.c
> @@ -197,15 +197,9 @@ static const struct sunxi_sid_cfg sun8i_h3_cfg =
> {
> .need_register_readout = true,
> };
>
> -static const struct sunxi_sid_cfg sun20i_d1_cfg = {
> - .value_offset = 0x200,
> - .size = 0x100,
> -};
> -
> static const struct sunxi_sid_cfg sun50i_a64_cfg = {
> .value_offset = 0x200,
> .size = 0x100,
> - .need_register_readout = true,
> };
>
> static const struct sunxi_sid_cfg sun50i_h6_cfg = {
> @@ -218,7 +212,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id
> sunxi_sid_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-sid", .data =
> &sun7i_a20_cfg },
> { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a83t-sid", .data =
> &sun50i_a64_cfg },
> { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h3-sid", .data =
> &sun8i_h3_cfg },
> - { .compatible = "allwinner,sun20i-d1-sid", .data =
> &sun20i_d1_cfg },
> + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun20i-d1-sid", .data =
> &sun50i_a64_cfg },
> { .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-sid", .data =
> &sun50i_a64_cfg },
> { .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5-sid", .data =
> &sun50i_a64_cfg },
> { .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h6-sid", .data =
> &sun50i_h6_cfg },
