On 8.08.2022 15:35, Christian Marangi wrote: > On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 12:55:36PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> >> >> On 7.08.2022 15:00, Christian Marangi wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 06:18:24PM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote: >>>> Add ipq8064-v2.0 dtsi variant that differ from original ipq8064 SoC for >>>> some additional pcie, sata and usb configuration values, additional >>>> reserved memory and serial output. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Any news for this?Unless Qualcomm naming was different back then, you should simply merge >> all of these changes into ipq8064.dtsi, as v1 is often the pre-production, >> internal chip revision and only the last one (or the last and second-last) >> are shipped in production devices. >> > > Mhh, this is not the case, there are dev board based on v1 and we also > have some device based on v1 (that have some difference for pci and usb) > One example is a Netgear r7500 where we have 2 revision one based on > ipq8064-v1.0 and one based on ipq8064-v2.0. Very interesting.. but if there really are devices shipping with v1, I guess it's the correct thing to keep both. Konrad
