On 09/08/2022 22:42, Eddie James wrote: >>> + ibm,inactive-on-init: >>> + description: This property describes whether or not the OCC should >>> + be marked as active during device initialization. The alternative >>> + is for user space to mark the device active based on higher level >>> + communications between the BMC and the host processor. >> I find the combination property name with this description confusing. It >> sounds like init of OCC and somehow it should be inactive? I assume if >> you initialize device, it is active. Or maybe the "init" is of something >> else? What is more, non-negation is easier to understand, so rather >> "ibm,active-on-boot" (or something like that). > > > Well, the host processor initializes the OCC during it's boot, but this > document is describing a binding to be used by a service processor > talking to the OCC. So the OCC may be in any state. The init meant > driver init, but I will simply the description and change the property > to be more explicit: ibm,no-poll-on-init since that is what is actually > happening. Similar to the FSI binding for no-scan-on-init. no-scan-on-init is not a good example. It wasn't even reviewed by Rob (looking at commit). In both cases you describe driver behavior which is not appropriate for bindings. Instead you should describe the hardware characteristics/feature/bug/state which require skipping the initialization. Best regards, Krzysztof
