On 09/08/2022 18:25, Frieder Schrempf wrote: > From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@xxxxxxxxxx> > > This updates the bindings in order to simplify the devicetree > structure and to add names for the boards that follow the latest > convention used by Kontron marketing. > > Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 31 +++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > index ef524378d449..7c4c27d553ec 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > @@ -553,8 +553,7 @@ properties: > - engicam,imx6ul-isiot # Engicam Is.IoT MX6UL eMMC/NAND Starter kit > - fsl,imx6ul-14x14-evk # i.MX6 UltraLite 14x14 EVK Board > - karo,imx6ul-tx6ul # Ka-Ro electronics TXUL-0010 Module > - - kontron,imx6ul-n6310-som # Kontron N6310 SOM > - - kontron,imx6ul-n6311-som # Kontron N6311 SOM > + - kontron,imx6ul-n631x-som # Kontron SL i.MX6UL (N631X SOM) Although board-level compatibles are not that important, yet still they follow the same rules as other DT bindings: no wildcards for compatibles. Therefore the change is not correct, in my opinion. Best regards, Krzysztof