Re: [PATCH v2 02/20] dt-bindings: power: Add power-domain header for RV1126

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 04:03, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 03:54:56PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 16:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 31/07/2022 19:47, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > > Add power-domain header for RV1126 SoC from description in TRM.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > Changes for v2:
> > > > - add blank line
> > > >
> > > >  include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
> > > >  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h
> > >
> > > Vendor in filename is needed.
> >
> > Yes this follows how similar rockchip vendor notation
> >
> > $ ls include/dt-bindings/power/rk3* -l
> >  include/dt-bindings/power/rk3036-power.h
> >  include/dt-bindings/power/rk3066-power.h
> >  include/dt-bindings/power/rk3128-power.h
> >  include/dt-bindings/power/rk3188-power.h
> >  include/dt-bindings/power/rk3228-power.h
> >  include/dt-bindings/power/rk3288-power.h
> >  include/dt-bindings/power/rk3328-power.h
> >  include/dt-bindings/power/rk3366-power.h
> >  include/dt-bindings/power/rk3368-power.h
> >  include/dt-bindings/power/rk3399-power.h
> >  include/dt-bindings/power/rk3568-power.h
> >
> > >
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 000000000000..38a68e000d38
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
> > > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > >
> > > Dual license, please, unless some copyrights are no allowing this.
> >
> > Yes, as we discussed in v1 - I'm not liable to change so I keep this as it is.
>
> I assume that would be Rockchip. Can someone from Rockchip please give
> an okay here to dual license?

Kever or Heiko - any comments on this?

Thanks,
Jagan.



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux