On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 at 16:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 03/08/2022 12:46, Jagan Teki wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 at 16:13, Krzysztof Kozlowski > > <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> On 03/08/2022 12:24, Jagan Teki wrote: > >>>> Vendor in filename is needed. > >>> > >>> Yes this follows how similar rockchip vendor notation > >>> > >>> $ ls include/dt-bindings/power/rk3* -l > >>> include/dt-bindings/power/rk3036-power.h > >>> include/dt-bindings/power/rk3066-power.h > >>> include/dt-bindings/power/rk3128-power.h > >>> include/dt-bindings/power/rk3188-power.h > >>> include/dt-bindings/power/rk3228-power.h > >>> include/dt-bindings/power/rk3288-power.h > >>> include/dt-bindings/power/rk3328-power.h > >>> include/dt-bindings/power/rk3366-power.h > >>> include/dt-bindings/power/rk3368-power.h > >>> include/dt-bindings/power/rk3399-power.h > >>> include/dt-bindings/power/rk3568-power.h > >> > >> > >> So when are we going to switch to vendor,device pattern if you keep > >> adding files with wrong naming? > > > > Do you mean the above files are following the wrong naming pattern? > > Yes, or at least discouraged naming. The recommended naming which I hope > all new files will follow are vendor,device.h. rockchip-rv1126-power.h Will this be Okay? Thanks, Jagan.
