On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 03:26:36 +0300 Vladimir Oltean wrote: > This is compile-tested only, but the equivalent change was tested by > Brian on a 5.10 kernel and it worked. > > I'm targeting just the "net" tree here (today 5.19 release candidates), > but this needs to be fixed separately for net-next and essentially every > other stable branch, since we will be lacking the port_bridge_flags > callbacks, and there has been a lot of general refactoring in the > microchip driver. > > Jakub, I wonder if I should let you do the merge resolution between > "net" and "net-next", or should I just resend against "net-next" and > keep this patch as one of the stable backports? I missed this question, sorry. Let's do the latter.
