On 29.07.2022 13:33, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 28/07/2022 14:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 28/07/2022 13:16, Shinjo Park wrote:
>>> Change the reference of sleep_clk to the same as qcom-apq8064.dtsi.
>>
>> You add label, not change something.
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shinjo Park <peremen@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Reviewed-by: David Heidelberg <david@xxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8960.dtsi | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8960.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8960.dtsi
>>> index e8cd1c9c0..991eb1948 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8960.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8960.dtsi
>>> @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ pxo_board: pxo_board {
>>> clock-output-names = "pxo_board";
>>> };
>>> - sleep_clk {
>>> + sleep_clk: sleep_clk {
>>
>> Since you touch the line, make the device node sleep-clk (device node
>> names should not have underscores) and mention this in commit msg.
>
>
> Then we are back to the compat issues, since the gcc expects the 'sleep_clk' clock.
clock-output-names = "sleep_clk";
Konrad
>
>
