Hi Krzysztof, Thank you for the review. On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 9:54 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 26/07/2022 20:06, Lad Prabhakar wrote: > > Document Renesas RZ/Five (R9A07G043) SoC and SMARC EVK based on this SoC. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/riscv/renesas.yaml | 49 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/renesas.yaml > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/renesas.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/renesas.yaml > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..f72f8aea6a82 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/renesas.yaml > > @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > > +%YAML 1.2 > > +--- > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/riscv/renesas.yaml# > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > > + > > +title: Renesas RZ/Five Platform Device Tree Bindings > > + > > +maintainers: > > + - Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > > + - Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > + > > +# We want to ignore this schema if the board is SMARC EVK based on ARM64 arch > > +select: > > + not: > > + properties: > > + compatible: > > + contains: > > + items: > > I think you should rather ignore the RiscV SoCs, not specific board. > You mean to ignore ARM/64 SoCs? Agreed just the below enum, should do the trick. - enum: - renesas,r9a07g043u11 - renesas,r9a07g043u12 - renesas,r9a07g044c1 - renesas,r9a07g044c2 - renesas,r9a07g044l1 - renesas,r9a07g044l2 - renesas,r9a07g054l1 - renesas,r9a07g054l2 > > + - const: renesas,smarc-evk > > + - enum: > > + - renesas,r9a07g043u11 > > + - renesas,r9a07g043u12 > > + - renesas,r9a07g044c1 > > + - renesas,r9a07g044c2 > > + - renesas,r9a07g044l1 > > + - renesas,r9a07g044l2 > > + - renesas,r9a07g054l1 > > + - renesas,r9a07g054l2 > > + - enum: > > + - renesas,r9a07g043 > > + - renesas,r9a07g044 > > + - renesas,r9a07g054 > > Did you actually test that it works and properly matches? > Yes I have run the dtbs_check and dt_binding _check for ARM64 and RISC-V. Do you see any cases where it can fail? Cheers, Prabhakar