Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] dt-bindings: irqchip: imx mu work as msi controller

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20/07/2022 23:30, Frank Li wrote:
> imx mu support generate irq by write a register.
> provide msi controller support so other driver
> can use it by standard msi interface.

Please start sentences with capital letter. Unfortunately I don't
understand the sentences. Please describe shortly the hardware.


> 
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../interrupt-controller/fsl,mu-msi.yaml      | 88 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 88 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/fsl,mu-msi.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/fsl,mu-msi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/fsl,mu-msi.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..e125294243af3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/fsl,mu-msi.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/interrupt-controller/fsl,mu-msi.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: NXP i.MX Messaging Unit (MU) work as msi controller
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>
> +
> +description: |
> +  The Messaging Unit module enables two processors within the SoC to
> +  communicate and coordinate by passing messages (e.g. data, status
> +  and control) through the MU interface. The MU also provides the ability
> +  for one processor to signal the other processor using interrupts.
> +
> +  Because the MU manages the messaging between processors, the MU uses
> +  different clocks (from each side of the different peripheral buses).
> +  Therefore, the MU must synchronize the accesses from one side to the
> +  other. The MU accomplishes synchronization using two sets of matching
> +  registers (Processor A-facing, Processor B-facing).
> +
> +  MU can work as msi interrupt controller to do doorbell
> +
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: /schemas/interrupt-controller/msi-controller.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    enum:
> +      - fsl,imx6sx-mu-msi
> +      - fsl,imx7ulp-mu-msi
> +      - fsl,imx8ulp-mu-msi
> +      - fsl,imx8ulp-mu-msi-s4
> +
> +  reg:
> +    minItems: 2

Not minItems but maxItems in general, but anyway you need to actually
list and describe the items (and then skip min/max)

> +
> +  reg-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: a
> +      - const: b
> +
> +  interrupts:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  clocks:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  power-domains:
> +    maxItems: 2

and here you correctly use maxItems, so why min in reg? Anyway, instead
you need to list and describe the items.

Actually I asked you this last time about interrupts, so you ignored
that comment.

> +
> +  power-domain-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: a
> +      - const: b
> +
> +  interrupt-controller: true
> +
> +  msi-controller: true
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +  - interrupts
> +  - msi-controller
> +  - interrupt-controller

Why different order than used in properties?



Best regards,
Krzysztof



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux