Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH v2 5/7] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Update gpu register list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/20/2022 11:34 AM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
On 7/19/2022 3:26 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:


On 7/19/2022 12:49 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Akhil P Oommen (2022-07-18 23:37:16)
On 7/19/2022 11:19 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Akhil P Oommen (2022-07-18 21:07:05)
On 7/14/2022 11:10 AM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
IIUC, qcom gdsc driver doesn't ensure hardware is collapsed since they
are vote-able switches. Ideally, we should ensure that the hw has
collapsed for gpu recovery because there could be transient votes from
other subsystems like hypervisor using their vote register.

I am not sure how complex the plumbing to gpucc driver would be to allow gpu driver to check hw status. OTOH, with this patch, gpu driver does a read operation on a gpucc register which is in always-on domain. That
means we don't need to vote any resource to access this register.

Reading between the lines here, you're saying that you have to read the
gdsc register to make sure that the gdsc is in some state? Can you
clarify exactly what you're doing? And how do you know that something
else in the kernel can't cause the register to change after it is read?
It certainly seems like we can't be certain because there is voting
involved.
From gpu driver, cx_gdscr.bit[31] (power off status) register can be polled to ensure that it *collapsed at least once*. We don't need to care if something turns ON gdsc after that.


yes, this looks like the best case effort to get the gpu to recover, but
the kernel driver really has no control to make sure this condition can
always be met (because it depends on other entities like hyp, trustzone etc right?)
Why not just put a worst case polling delay?

I didn't get you entirely. Where do you mean to keep the polling delay?



Stephen/Rajendra/Taniya, any suggestion?
Why can't you assert a gpu reset signal with the reset APIs? This series seems to jump through a bunch of hoops to get the gdsc and power domain
to "reset" when I don't know why any of that is necessary. Can't we
simply assert a reset to the hardware after recovery completes so the
device is back into a good known POR (power on reset) state?
That is because there is no register interface to reset GPU CX domain.
The recommended sequence from HW design folks is to collapse both cx and
gx gdsc to properly reset gpu/gmu.


Ok. One knee jerk reaction is to treat the gdsc as a reset then and
possibly mux that request along with any power domain on/off so that if
the reset is requested and the power domain is off nothing happens.
Otherwise if the power domain is on then it manually sequences and
controls the two gdscs so that the GPU is reset and then restores the
enable state of the power domain.
It would be fatal to asynchronously pull the plug on CX gdsc forcefully because there might be another gpu/smmu driver thread accessing registers in cx domain.

-Akhil.

But, we can move the cx collapse polling to gpucc and expose it to gpu driver using 'reset' framework. I am not very familiar with clk driver, but I did a rough prototype here (untested): https://zerobin.net/?d34b5f958be3b9b8#NKGzdPy9fgcuOqXZ/XqjI7b8JWcivqe+oSTf4yWHSOU=

If this approach is acceptable, I will send it out as a separate series.

-Akhil.



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux