On Wed, 2022-07-20 at 19:07 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 20/07/2022 17:00, Martyn Welch wrote: > > Add "msc" vendor prefix for MSC Technologies GmbH > > (https://www.msc-technologies.eu). > > Does not really work - leads to Avnet, so there is no MSC anymore? > It still seems to be used as branding by Avnet. > > > > Signed-off-by: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > Changes in v2: > > - New addition > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml > > index 0496773a3c4d..1658357bc1c4 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml > > @@ -816,6 +816,8 @@ patternProperties: > > "^mrvl,.*": > > description: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. > > deprecated: true > > + "^msc,.*": > > + description: MSC Technologies GmbH. > > This should be rather msct or msctech, but anyway in fact you maybe > should use avnet? > My rationale for using MSC Technologies is that is how the device is described on the website as being a MSC device. I think the amalgamation of the MSC website into Avnet's has happened in the last year or so. I assume a new device released in the near future would be branded more directly as an Avnet device, or maybe not, I see that the i.MX 9 is being described as "MSC SM2S-IMX93". I'll switch to msctech unless there are objections to that. Martyn > > "^mscc,.*": > > description: Microsemi Corporation > > "^msi,.*": > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
