On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 14:49 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 15/07/2022 19:54, Kris Bahnsen wrote: > > On Fri, 2022-07-15 at 08:42 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > On 14/07/2022 23:26, Kris Bahnsen wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2022-07-14 at 10:34 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > > On 14/07/2022 00:12, Kris Bahnsen wrote: > > > > > > Add initial support of the i.MX6UL based TS-7553-V2 platform. > > > > > > > > > > Use subject prefix matching the subsystem. git log --oneline -- > > > > > > > > Can you please elaborate? The subject prefix is "ARM: dts:", I'm not > > > > sure what is missing. Should it be something like > > > > "ARM: dts: imx6ul-ts7553v2:" in this case? > > > > > > Run the command, you will see. > > > > I had previously run the command and the output of it did not make sense in > > the context of your prior comment. Forgive my ignorance, but I'd like to > > understand specifically what you mean here so we can do the correct thing > > in the future. > > > > $ git log --oneline -- | head -n 20 > > This obviously does not make sense. -- as you can read in git log help > and several other Unix/Linux commands is marking path arguments. You > want to run it on specific subsystem, don't you? I've looked at commits for imx6ul-* devicetree files and that was how I derived this commit/subject. I see a number of different patterns and if one is preferred over the other I would appreciate the clarification. e.g. looking at commits of imx6ul-* "ARM: dts:" is used for a number of initial devicetree commits "ARM: dts: imx6ul: <board>:" is used a few times "ARM: dts: imx6ul-<board>:" is also used a few times For initial commits of a devicetree, or modifications of a devicetree, what is the preferred pattern moving forward? Thank you for your continued support. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
