On 19/07/2022 15:23, Christian Marangi wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 11:42:29PM -0500, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Thu 07 Jul 19:03 CDT 2022, Christian Marangi wrote:
Convert lcc-ipq806x driver to parent_data API.
Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx>
---
v5:
- Fix the same compilation error (don't know what the hell happen
to my buildroot)
v4:
- Fix compilation error
v3:
- Inline pxo pll4 parent
- Change .name from pxo to pxo_board
drivers/clk/qcom/lcc-ipq806x.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/lcc-ipq806x.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/lcc-ipq806x.c
index ba90bebba597..72d6aea5be30 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/lcc-ipq806x.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/lcc-ipq806x.c
@@ -34,7 +34,9 @@ static struct clk_pll pll4 = {
.status_bit = 16,
.clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
.name = "pll4",
- .parent_names = (const char *[]){ "pxo" },
+ .parent_data = &(const struct clk_parent_data) {
+ .fw_name = "pxo", .name = "pxo_board",
This changes the behavior from looking for the globally named "pxo" to
look for the globally named "pxo_board", in the event that no
clock-names of "pxo" was found (based on the .fw_name).
So you probably want to keep this as .fw_name = "pxo", .name = "pxo".
Hi,
I will make this change but just for reference, I could be wrong by
Dimitry pointed out that the pattern is .fw_name pxo .name pxo_board.
The original patch had both set to pxo and it was asked to be changed.
We are generally trying to get rid of manually registered 'pxo' clock,
thus all parent_names = pxo/cxo/xo entries are converted to .fw_name =
"pxo/cxo/xo", .name = "pxo_board/cxo_board/xo_board" clocks. This has
been done previously for all converted drivers w/o any questions. May be
it's worth it mentioning pxo_board in the commit message.
+ },
.num_parents = 1,
.ops = &clk_pll_ops,
},
@@ -64,9 +66,9 @@ static const struct parent_map lcc_pxo_pll4_map[] = {
{ P_PLL4, 2 }
};
-static const char * const lcc_pxo_pll4[] = {
- "pxo",
- "pll4_vote",
+static const struct clk_parent_data lcc_pxo_pll4[] = {
+ { .fw_name = "pxo", .name = "pxo" },
+ { .fw_name = "pll4_vote", .name = "pll4_vote" },
This is a reference to a clock defined in this same driver, so you can
use { .hw = &pll4_vote.clkr.hw } to avoid the lookup all together.
Eh... pll4_vote is defined in gcc (for some reason) the one we have here
is pll4.
I asked if this could be fixed in some way but it was said that it's
better to not complicate things too much.
The chain is:
pxo -> pll4 @ lcc -> pll4_vote @ gcc -> i2s clocks @ lcc.
};
static struct freq_tbl clk_tbl_aif_mi2s[] = {
@@ -131,18 +133,14 @@ static struct clk_rcg mi2s_osr_src = {
.enable_mask = BIT(9),
.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
.name = "mi2s_osr_src",
- .parent_names = lcc_pxo_pll4,
- .num_parents = 2,
+ .parent_data = lcc_pxo_pll4,
+ .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(lcc_pxo_pll4),
.ops = &clk_rcg_ops,
.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_GATE,
},
},
};
-static const char * const lcc_mi2s_parents[] = {
- "mi2s_osr_src",
-};
-
static struct clk_branch mi2s_osr_clk = {
.halt_reg = 0x50,
.halt_bit = 1,
@@ -152,7 +150,9 @@ static struct clk_branch mi2s_osr_clk = {
.enable_mask = BIT(17),
.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
.name = "mi2s_osr_clk",
- .parent_names = lcc_mi2s_parents,
+ .parent_hws = (const struct clk_hw*[]){
+ &mi2s_osr_src.clkr.hw,
+ },
.num_parents = 1,
.ops = &clk_branch_ops,
.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
@@ -167,7 +167,9 @@ static struct clk_regmap_div mi2s_div_clk = {
.clkr = {
.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
.name = "mi2s_div_clk",
- .parent_names = lcc_mi2s_parents,
+ .parent_hws = (const struct clk_hw*[]){
It would be wonderful if you could keep a space between ) and { in
these.
You mean only here or in the entire patch? I assume the latter.
+ &mi2s_osr_src.clkr.hw,
+ },
.num_parents = 1,
.ops = &clk_regmap_div_ops,
},
@@ -183,7 +185,9 @@ static struct clk_branch mi2s_bit_div_clk = {
.enable_mask = BIT(15),
.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
.name = "mi2s_bit_div_clk",
- .parent_names = (const char *[]){ "mi2s_div_clk" },
+ .parent_hws = (const struct clk_hw*[]){
+ &mi2s_div_clk.clkr.hw,
+ },
.num_parents = 1,
.ops = &clk_branch_ops,
.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
@@ -191,6 +195,10 @@ static struct clk_branch mi2s_bit_div_clk = {
},
};
+static const struct clk_parent_data lcc_mi2s_bit_div_codec_clk[] = {
+ { .hw = &mi2s_bit_div_clk.clkr.hw, },
+ { .fw_name = "mi2s_codec_clk", .name = "mi2s_codec_clk" },
Is mi2s_codec_clk and external clock? I don't see it documented in the
DT binding. And if we're introducing new clock-names, perhaps we could
skip the _clk suffix - because obviously it's a clock :)
Regards,
Bjorn
I also didn't find where is mi2s_codec_clk... but yes I will change the
fw_name with the clock with _clk stripped.
Downstream seems not to use _codec_clk, it just always uses the
bit_div_clk as the codec's bit_clk. Maybe Srini knows additional
details, as APQ8064 has more or less the same structure of clocks.
Will send v6 with the other question clarified.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
