On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 10:08:57PM +0000, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 07:10:48PM -0700, Colin Foster wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 11:21:16AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 08:51:35 +0100 Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > Can this go into net-next if there are no more complains over the > > > > > weekend? Anyone still planning to review? > > > > > > > > As the subsystem with the fewest changes, I'm not sure why it would. > > > > > > Yeah, just going by the tag in the subject. I have no preference, > > > looks like it applies cleanly to Linus'. > > > > > > > I'd planed to route this in via MFD and send out a pull-request for > > > > other sub-system maintainers to pull from. > > > > > > > > If you would like to co-ordinate it instead, you'd be welcome to. > > > > However, I (and probably Linus) would need a succinct immutable branch > > > > to pull from. > > > > > > Oh, that'd be perfect, sorry, I didn't realize there was already a plan. > > > If you're willing to carry on as intended, please do. > > > > > > Colin if there is another version please make a note of the above > > > merging plan in the cover letter and drop the net-next tag. > > > Just in case my goldfish brain forgets. > > > > I wasn't sure of the plan, but this makes sense to bring it through MFD. > > Fortunately there's enough work for me on the DSA front that there's no > > way that'll land before this merge window - so I have no objection to it > > going any non-net-next path. > > > > I'll look to Lee as to whether there should be a v14 with the header > > guard addition per Vladimir's review, or whether that should be in a > > future patch set. I'm happy to go either way. > > From my side, the changes to this patch set can be incremental, I'd be > happy if Lee would take them as is. Just making sure this hasn't slipped through the cracks. Should I resend this next week (Monday / Tuesday?) with the Reviewed-by tags and switch it to MFD instead of net-next?
