On 15/07/2022 10:00, Stephan Gerhold wrote: >> > > Sorry, I'm not sure I understand you correctly: What do you mean with > "the previous bindings were not mentioning it alone"? "qcom,q6v5-pil" > was listed as standalone compatible just like all the other compatibles: > > - compatible: > Usage: required > Value type: <string> > Definition: must be one of: > "qcom,q6v5-pil", <---- You're right, sorry for confusion. Best regards, Krzysztof
