On 7/13/22 08:26, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 7.07.2022 09:00, William Zhang wrote:
Use CONFIG_ARCH_BCMBCA to build all the BCMBCA SoC dts and remove
CONFIG_ARCH_BCM_63XX from the makefile
Signed-off-by: William Zhang <william.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
(no changes since v1)
arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
index 38d9c60aece7..1bf8e2f8ee68 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
@@ -147,8 +147,6 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM_53573) += \
bcm47189-luxul-xap-810.dtb \
bcm47189-tenda-ac9.dtb \
bcm947189acdbmr.dtb
-dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM_63XX) += \
- bcm963138dvt.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM_CYGNUS) += \
bcm911360_entphn.dtb \
bcm911360k.dtb \
@@ -184,6 +182,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BRCMSTB) += \
bcm7445-bcm97445svmb.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCMBCA) += \
bcm947622.dtb \
+ bcm963138dvt.dtb \
bcm963148.dtb \
bcm963178.dtb \
bcm96756.dtb \
Do we want to mix all that DT files? Are ARCH_BCM_63XX (ex-)users
interested in compiling all of them?
For IPROC SoCs we have separated symbols: ARCH_BCM_CYGNUS / ARCH_BCM_HR2
/ ARCH_BCM_NSP / ARCH_BCM_5301X and we compile arch specific DT files
only.
I am fine with that and build systems (buildroot and OpenWrt at least)
typically offer a way to produce a device specific image that will
contain a single DTB fit for the target device.
What we would be optimizing for would be build time vs. coverage, as a
maintainer I favor coverage as it allows me to build everyone in one
sweep. We could make the building of the 63138 conditional upon
BCMBCA_CORTEXA9 if that bothers you.
--
Florian
