On 13/07/2022 15:35, Tomer Maimon wrote:
>>> +static int npcm8xx_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> +{
>>> + struct npcm8xx_pinctrl *pctrl;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + pctrl = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pctrl), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!pctrl)
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> + pctrl->dev = &pdev->dev;
>>> + dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, pctrl);
>>> +
>>> + pctrl->gcr_regmap =
>>> + syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("nuvoton,npcm845-gcr");
>>
>> No. Use property. By this patchset, I would expect that you learnt from
>> previous mistakes around this. Why repeating the same trouble second time?
> You suggest to use phandle property like nuvoton,sysgcr even that the
> NPCM8XX pin controller driver is used only NPCM8XX SoC, so the only
> GCR node in the NPCM8XX SoC is nuvoton,npcm845-gcr?
Yes. The previous case (reset driver, AFAIR) was also about driver used
only in one SoC, wasn't it?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
