On 12-07-22, 17:55, Johan Hovold wrote: > Ok, thanks for the details. I'd still look into if there's some way to > avoid setting clk_count when there are no clocks as it sounds like an > anti-pattern that will just make the code harder to understand and > maintain. Here is an attempt from me :) https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1657695140.git.viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx/ -- viresh