Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: usb: Add binding for TI USB8041 hub controller

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 11:12:06PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 12/07/2022 19:25, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > Hi Alexander,
> > 
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 05:06:25PM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
> >> The TI USB8041 is a USB 3.0 hub controller with 4 ports.
> >>
> >> This initial version of the binding only describes USB related aspects
> >> of the USB8041, it does not cover the option of connecting the controller
> >> as an i2c slave.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> Well, this is essentially a ripoff of
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/realtek,rts5411.yaml with USB IDs
> >> replaced, reset-gpio added and example adjusted.
> >> IMHO this should be merged together with realtek,rts5411.yaml. Is it ok
> >> to rename bindings files? I guess a common onboard-usb-hub.yaml matching
> >> the driver seens reasonable. Any recommendations how to proceed?
> > 
> > It's a tradeoff between keeping the individual bindings simple and avoid
> > unnecessary duplication. The current RTS5411 and TI USB8041 bindings are
> > very similar, which suggests combining them. However over time hubs with
> > diverging features could be added (e.g. with multiple regulators, a link
> > to an I2C/SPI bus, a clock, ...). With that a common binding might become
> > too messy.
> > 
> > From a quick look through Documentation/devicetree/bindings it doesn't
> > seem common to have generic bindings that cover components from multiple
> > vendors. In that sense I'm leaning towards separate bindings.
> > 
> > Rob, do you have any particular preference or suggestion?
> 
> Not Rob, but my suggestion is not to merge bindings of unrelated
> devices, even if they are the same class. By unrelated I mean, made by
> different companies, designed differently and having nothing in common
> by design. Bindings can be still similar, but should not be merged just
> because they are similar.

Thanks for your advice, let's keep separate bindings then.



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux