Hi Krzysztof could you have a look at the below question ? If no need to resend from Tommaso I think the series could be collected for v5.20. On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 11:37:05AM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote: > Hi Tommaso, Krzysztof, > > This has been reviewed by Krzysztof already, so I guess it's fine, > but let me ask anyway > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:48:34PM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote: > > Add documentation of device tree in YAML schema for the OV5693 > > CMOS image sensor from Omnivision > > > > Signed-off-by: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Changes since v1: > > - Fix allOf position as suggested by Krzysztof > > - Remove port description as suggested by Krzysztof > > - Fix EOF as suggested by Krzysztof > > > > Changes since v2: > > - Fix commit body as suggested by Krzysztof > > > > Changes since v3: > > - Add reviewed-by tags, suggested by Jacopo, Krzysztof > > > > Changes since v4: > > - Remove wrong Sakari reviewed-by tag, suggested by Krzysztof, Sakari > > > > .../bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov5693.yaml | 106 ++++++++++++++++++ > > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 107 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov5693.yaml > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov5693.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov5693.yaml > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..b83c9fc04023 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov5693.yaml > > @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > > +# Copyright (c) 2022 Amarulasolutions > > +%YAML 1.2 > > +--- > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/media/i2c/ovti,ov5693.yaml# > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > > + > > +title: Omnivision OV5693 CMOS Sensor > > + > > +maintainers: > > + - Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > + > > +description: | > > + The Omnivision OV5693 is a high performance, 1/4-inch, 5 megapixel, CMOS > > + image sensor that delivers 2592x1944 at 30fps. It provides full-frame, > > + sub-sampled, and windowed 10-bit MIPI images in various formats via the > > + Serial Camera Control Bus (SCCB) interface. > > + > > + OV5693 is controlled via I2C and two-wire Serial Camera Control Bus (SCCB). > > + The sensor output is available via CSI-2 serial data output (up to 2-lane). > > + > > +allOf: > > + - $ref: /schemas/media/video-interface-devices.yaml# > > + > > +properties: > > + compatible: > > + const: ovti,ov5693 > > + > > + reg: > > + maxItems: 1 > > + > > + clocks: > > + description: > > + System input clock (aka XVCLK). From 6 to 27 MHz. > > + maxItems: 1 > > + > > + dovdd-supply: > > + description: > > + Digital I/O voltage supply, 1.8V. > > + > > + avdd-supply: > > + description: > > + Analog voltage supply, 2.8V. > > + > > + dvdd-supply: > > + description: > > + Digital core voltage supply, 1.2V. > > + > > + reset-gpios: > > + description: > > + The phandle and specifier for the GPIO that controls sensor reset. > > + This corresponds to the hardware pin XSHUTDN which is physically > > + active low. > > + maxItems: 1 > > + > > +required: > > + - compatible > > + - reg > > + - clocks > > + - dovdd-supply > > + - avdd-supply > > + - dvdd-supply > > Should supplies be made mandatory ? Sensors are often powered by fixed > rails. Do we want DTS writers to create "fixed-regulators" for all of > them ? The fact the regulator framework creates dummies if there's no > entry in .dts for a regulator makes me think it's fine to have them > optional, but I understand how Linux works should not be an indication > of how a bindings should look like. > This question ^ :) Thanks j > > + - port > > + > > +unevaluatedProperties: false > > + > > +examples: > > + - | > > + #include <dt-bindings/clock/px30-cru.h> > > + #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h> > > + #include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h> > > + > > + i2c { > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <0>; > > + > > + ov5693: camera@36 { > > + compatible = "ovti,ov5693"; > > + reg = <0x36>; > > + > > + reset-gpios = <&gpio2 RK_PB1 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; > > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > > + pinctrl-0 = <&cif_clkout_m0>; > > + > > + clocks = <&cru SCLK_CIF_OUT>; > > + assigned-clocks = <&cru SCLK_CIF_OUT>; > > + assigned-clock-rates = <19200000>; > > + > > + avdd-supply = <&vcc_1v8>; > > + dvdd-supply = <&vcc_1v2>; > > + dovdd-supply = <&vcc_2v8>; > > + > > + rotation = <90>; > > + orientation = <0>; > > + > > + port { > > + ucam_out: endpoint { > > + remote-endpoint = <&mipi_in_ucam>; > > + data-lanes = <1 2>; > > + link-frequencies = /bits/ 64 <450000000>; > > + }; > > + }; > > + }; > > + }; > > + > > +... > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > index 1fc9ead83d2a..844307cb20c4 100644 > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -14719,6 +14719,7 @@ M: Daniel Scally <djrscally@xxxxxxxxx> > > L: linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > S: Maintained > > T: git git://linuxtv.org/media_tree.git > > +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov5693.yaml > > F: drivers/media/i2c/ov5693.c > > > > OMNIVISION OV5695 SENSOR DRIVER > > -- > > 2.25.1 > >
