Hi Viacheslav,
Thanks for your patch! I have a comment below.
On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 at 16:22, Viacheslav Mitrofanov
<v.v.mitrofanov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> HiFive unmatched supports PDMA but is not implemented in DT.
>
> Add the PDMA node in SiFive FU740 soc-specific DT file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Mitrofanov <v.v.mitrofanov@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu740-c000.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu740-c000.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu740-c000.dtsi
> index 7b77c13496d8..4bd670d8632f 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu740-c000.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu740-c000.dtsi
> @@ -161,6 +161,14 @@ prci: clock-controller@10000000 {
> #clock-cells = <1>;
> #reset-cells = <1>;
> };
> + dma: dma-controller@3000000 {
> + compatible = "sifive,pdma0";
I think this should be
compatible = "sifive,fu740-c000-pdma", "sifive,pdma0";
..but before adding that you'll also need a separate patch to
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/sifive,fu540-c000-pdma.yaml
..adding the new compatible string. Otherwise this will complain
make ARCH=riscv
DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/sifive,fu540-c000-pdma.yaml
dtbs_check
/Emil
> + reg = <0x0 0x3000000 0x0 0x8000>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&plic0>;
> + interrupts = <11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18>;
> + dma-channels = <4>;
> + #dma-cells = <1>;
> + };
> uart0: serial@10010000 {
> compatible = "sifive,fu740-c000-uart", "sifive,uart0";
> reg = <0x0 0x10010000 0x0 0x1000>;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
