Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] dt-binding: power: power-domain: add power-supply-needs-irq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Montag, dem 11.07.2022 um 12:38 +0200 schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> On 11/07/2022 11:45, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> > Add the power-supply-needs-irq board description property for power
> > domains.
> 
> Where is a board description here? I think you just meant
> "power-supply-needs-irq property"?
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml        | 10
> > ++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-
> > domain.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-
> > domain.yaml
> > index 889091b9814f..e82c2f7ccb97 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml
> > @@ -70,6 +70,16 @@ properties:
> >        by the given provider should be subdomains of the domain
> > specified
> >        by this binding.
> >  
> > +  power-supply: true
> 
> This is a new property not described in the commit msg.

true, I think it's missing and could be added as a separate patch.

> 
> > +
> > +  power-supply-needs-irq:
> > +    type: boolean
> > +    description:
> > +      A power-supply can link for example to a regulator
> > controlled via
> > +      i2c or otherwise needing interrupts enabled to be able to
> > enable and
> > +      disable. 
> 
> Not really a property of power domain. How the regulator supply works
> is
> entirely up to regulator. Otherwise such property should appear for
> every device.

you're right. The power-domain driver could read the power-supply
regulator node directly. Still, I think then a new regulator property
is needed instead, or is it?

> 
> > This property makes various callbacks usually run in the
> > +      noirq phase, being run when interrupts are available.
> 
> Last sentence does not fit - you embed Linux implementation into DT
> bindings. noirq phase is Linux specific.

oh I keep making this mistake. thanks for the fast review!

> 
> > +
> >  required:
> >    - "#power-domain-cells"
> >  
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux