Hello Krzysztof, Am Montag, 11. Juli 2022, 11:17:41 CEST schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski: > On 11/07/2022 10:16, Alexander Stein wrote: > > Add regulators for each power domain. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov9282.yaml | 9 +++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov9282.yaml > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov9282.yaml index > > 285f8c85f253..9abfaabd373a 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov9282.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov9282.yaml > > > > @@ -39,6 +39,15 @@ properties: > > description: Reference to the GPIO connected to the XCLR pin, if any. > > maxItems: 1 > > > > + avdd-supply: > > + description: Analog power supply > > + > > + dovdd-supply: > > + description: Digital I/O power supply > > + > > + dvdd-supply: > > + description: Digital core supply > > + > > Are all these valid for both variants/devices? I cannot say for sure due to lack of datasheet, but given that other model bindings like ov8865 [1] or ov5640 [2] have the same regulators, I think it is safe to assume these are valid for ov9281 and ov9282 as well. Best regards, Alexander [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/ Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov8865.yaml#n29 [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/ Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov5640.yaml
