On Tuesday 30 September 2014 20:54:41 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 September 2014 18:48:21 Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > > > > These are the functions I found that refer to pci_sys_data on arm32:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > pcibios_add_bus
> > > > > > pcibios_remove_bus
> >
> > These are only needed if you want to do per HB processing of the bus
> >
> > > > > > pcibios_align_resource
> >
> > mvebu is the only user of this function.
> >
> > > > > > pci_mmap_page_range
> >
> > This is only needed when mapping a PCI resource to userspace. Is that your case here?
> >
> > > > > > pci_domain_nr
> > > > > > pci_proc_domain
> >
> > We have equivalent functionality in the generic patches for those.
> >
>
> We clearly don't need those functions for the new drivers, but that's not
> the point. The problem is that when you build a kernel that has both
> a traditional host bridge driver and a new one in it, you always get those
> functions and they get called from the PCI core, with incorrect arguments.
FWIW, the last time we discussed this, I think I had suggested that the
functions that are currently architecture specific and have a generic
__weak fallback could become function pointers in a per-host structure
passed to pci_scan_root_bus, either a new structure or an extended
struct pci_ops. Something along these lines:
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h
index 7fc42784becb..3da32fc631d0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h
@@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ struct hw_pci {
resource_size_t start,
resource_size_t size,
resource_size_t align);
- void (*add_bus)(struct pci_bus *bus);
void (*remove_bus)(struct pci_bus *bus);
};
@@ -65,7 +64,6 @@ struct pci_sys_data {
resource_size_t start,
resource_size_t size,
resource_size_t align);
- void (*add_bus)(struct pci_bus *bus);
void (*remove_bus)(struct pci_bus *bus);
void *private_data; /* platform controller private data */
};
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
index 17a26c17f7f5..3cbcf8dc41e4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
@@ -360,13 +360,6 @@ void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcibios_fixup_bus);
-void pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
-{
- struct pci_sys_data *sys = bus->sysdata;
- if (sys->add_bus)
- sys->add_bus(bus);
-}
-
void pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
{
struct pci_sys_data *sys = bus->sysdata;
@@ -475,7 +468,6 @@ static void pcibios_init_hw(struct device *parent, struct hw_pci *hw,
sys->swizzle = hw->swizzle;
sys->map_irq = hw->map_irq;
sys->align_resource = hw->align_resource;
- sys->add_bus = hw->add_bus;
sys->remove_bus = hw->remove_bus;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sys->resources);
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c
index b1315e197ffb..c9a0ee0429e8 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c
@@ -716,6 +716,7 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_rd_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn, int where,
static struct pci_ops mvebu_pcie_ops = {
.read = mvebu_pcie_rd_conf,
.write = mvebu_pcie_wr_conf,
+ .add_bus = mvebu_pcie_add_bus,
};
static int mvebu_pcie_setup(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
@@ -823,7 +824,6 @@ static void mvebu_pcie_enable(struct mvebu_pcie *pcie)
hw.map_irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci;
hw.ops = &mvebu_pcie_ops;
hw.align_resource = mvebu_pcie_align_resource;
- hw.add_bus = mvebu_pcie_add_bus;
pci_common_init(&hw);
}
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index a63a47a70846..be6d56358320 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -1885,6 +1885,8 @@ int __weak pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
void __weak pcibios_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
{
+ if (bus->ops && bus->ops->add_bus)
+ bus->ops->add_bus(bus);
}
void __weak pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
