RE: [PATCH 07/10] input: keyboard: adp5588-keys: fix coding style warnings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, July 8, 2022 4:50 PM
> To: Sa, Nuno <Nuno.Sa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: devicetree <devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; open list:GPIO
> SUBSYSTEM <linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-input <linux-
> input@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>; Bartosz Golaszewski
> <brgl@xxxxxxxx>; Hennerich, Michael
> <Michael.Hennerich@xxxxxxxxxx>; Rob Herring
> <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Linus Walleij
> <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] input: keyboard: adp5588-keys: fix coding
> style warnings
> 
> [External]
> 
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 11:36 AM Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Just some code cleanup regarding coding style. No functional
> changes
> > intended.
> 
> ...
> 
> > -#define ADP5588_KE_IEN         (1 << 0)
> 
> > +#define ADP5588_KE_IEN         BIT(0)
> 
> This is actually a change. And if there wasn't bits.h included, you
> would do it as well.
> 

You mean because of it being unsigned now? Well, I guess it's true
but in practice I don't think it will have any side effect..

> ...
> 
> >  #define ADP5588_KEC            0xF
> 
> Probably then GENMASK() ?

Makes sense yes...

> ...
> 
> >  #define KEY_EV_MASK            (0x7F)
> 
> GENMASK()
> 
> ...
> 
> > -#define KP_SEL(x)              (0xFFFF >> (16 - x))    /* 2^x-1 */
> > +#define KP_SEL(x)              (0xFFFF >> (16 - (x)))  /* 2^x-1 */
> 
> Ditto.
> 

- Nuno Sá




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux