Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] iio: adc: Add rtq6056 support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> 於 2022年7月6日 週三 晚上8:45寫道:
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 3:08 AM ChiYuan Huang <u0084500@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> 於 2022年7月6日 週三 凌晨3:09寫道:
> > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 6:31 PM cy_huang <u0084500@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > > +KernelVersion: 5.15.31
> > >
> > > ^^^ Wrong
> > >
> > I really cannot understand what kernel version I need to specified.
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHp75VeBdgbyDQXEYb9ZZdi3AU=vPw6aKGWbNLnuA_QoN4LE4A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > Last time, my understanding is to use the realistic kernel version.
> > Then from my  development environment, the kernel  I used is 5.15.31.
> > That's why I changed it from '5.18.2' to '5.15.31'.
> >
> > Do you mind to tell me what kernel version I need to write for this
> > ABI test document?
> > I'm almost confused about 'realistic', 'non-stable', nor 'developing'.
> >
> > If to write '5.19' or the future version '5.20', is it ok?
>
> It's as simple as "next version that most likely your patch will be
> in", in 99.9% cases it's 'current-cycle-version + 1', i.e. 5.20.
>
It really confuse me for days.
Now, it's clear.
Thanks.
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux